Practical 3D measurement technology training
directly in your company
Safer, faster, more efficient: Get yourself and your team ready for ZEISS Inspect / GOM
How can measurement results from optical 3D measurement technology using the GOM ATOS be reliably compared with a coordinate measuring machine?
This is precisely where our advanced seminar for ZEISS Inspect / GOM comes in.
This training is aimed at companies that want to accelerate their pre-series measurements, implement tool corrections more quickly, and simultaneously ensure comparable measurement results between optical and tactile measurements. We conduct the training at your company – hands-on, using your existing system, peripheral devices, and components.

MICHAEL RAY
Managing Director & Training Manager
I look forward to working with you to get the most out of your system. Schedule your personal training appointment!

Training content (individually tailored)
- Analysis of the existing measurement strategy → Goal: Comparability between optical and tactile measurement
- Measurement description as the basis for evaluation → Transfer of the CMM logic to ZEISS Inspect
- Element formation according to the CMM principle → planes, lines, circles, cylinders, etc. via defined points instead of automatic elements.
- Comparable evaluation methodology → Identical reference systems and evaluation principles as on the CMM
- Efficient point strategy → Use of auxiliary geometries for targeted point generation
- Targeted use of cluster function → Reduction of effort for recurring geometries
- User-defined inspection principles → Standardization and acceleration of evaluation
- Handling repetitive design elements → Fast creation through intelligent preparation
- Pattern exports & further processing → e.g. export of individual patterns in .IGES format
Case study
This is how a recent seminar went
The customer: “Toolmaking and design require fast, valid measurement results and CAD-compatible data. In series production, measurements are taken on a CMM – the optical system is significantly faster, but the strategy differs. How do we make the results comparable?”
The following optimizations were implemented in the actual process:
- Adaptation of the evaluation to the CMM measurement description
- Construction elements consistently built up via defined points
- Using the cluster function for significant time savings
- Use of auxiliary geometries for structured point generation
- Introduction of user-defined inspection principles
- Export of sections in .IGES format for construction purposes
Result: The deviations between optical and tactile measurements were almost consistently in the micrometer range. The design team was able to directly use the data – particularly thanks to the precise cross-sectional exports.
AM Raylike
Why choose us?
From designers for metrology technicians – practical & efficient
- On-site seminar
- We build directly on your existing knowledge.
- Experienced designer and measurement technology user as trainer
- Measurement and evaluation on real components
- Customized handout based on your data
- Group seminars for the entire team are possible.
- Further support: process guidance, in-depth training, ZEISS / GOM programming (see also advanced seminar)

What we need from you in advance
To ensure the training is optimally prepared, we clarify the following in advance, among other things:
- Which ZEISS Inspect version is being used?
- Example file of a component (ideally as .STEP)
- Measurement strategy: Drawing tolerances or pass/fail evaluation?
- Existing measurement description (CMM evaluation)
- Are components measured repeatedly? (e.g., in a phased project)
- Are there report templates available?
- Further processing of the data (CSV, .IGES etc.)
General questions
Hello. Here you'll find more key points on the topic:


